Fair trade or free trade? Let your voice be heard on Minnesota’s future!
The Obama Administration is negotiating two new mega trade deals (one with Pacific Rim countries, another with Europe) entirely in secret, with the goal of further expanding the NAFTA-model of free trade. These trade agreements could have major impacts on Minnesota's farmers, workers, small business owners and rural communities. They could limit Minnesota’s ability to support local food and energy systems and grow local businesses. In order to stay up to speed, Minnesota has set up a new Trade Policy Advisory Council (TPAC) to advise the state legislature and Governor.
TPAC wants to hear from Minnesotans: What concerns do you have about free trade? What role could TPAC play in the future? Now is your opportunity to have a say in our future trade policy. Complete the survey and let them know future trade negotiations should be public, not secret. Help ensure the voices of all Minnesotans are heard in the development of trade agreements and that they protect local control and our quality of life. The free trade model has failed for Minnesota and we need a new approach to trade. Help ensure the voices of all Minnesotans are heard before trade agreements are completed, and that they protect local control, our natural resources and our quality of life.
Source: Agence France Presse
Published March 1, 2004
Agence France Presse | By M. JEGATHESAN | February 27, 2004 Environmentalists claimed victory over the United States Friday as more than 100 countries agreed to international rules covering the export of genetically-modified crops and food.
Signatories to the UN's Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety, which came into force in September last year, decided at a conference here on a "rigorous system" for handling, transporting, packaging and identifying genetically-engineered exports.
The agreement "foiled attempts by the USA and other GM exporting countries to weaken this newborn international agreement on GMOs (genetically modified organisms)", the Friends of the Earth environmental group said in a statement.
The United States, the world's biggest producer of GM crops, is already involved in a struggle over the issue with the European Union in the World Trade Organisation (WTO) and was quick to express its disappointment.
"We understand the concerns that countries have to protect their biodiversity, but we believe you can't just erect walls and have regulatory procedures that are not based on science," biotech trade policy spokeswoman Deborah Malac said.
"Our biggest disappointment is that we feel they are moving down a path away from practical steps. They are moving very, very quickly in a direction without being sure parties can implement their obligations."
The US has not signed the protocol, which has been ratified by 86 countries and the European Union, and lobbied hard on the sidelines of the conference for the minimal labelling of GM products.
Critics, however, have dubbed such products -- known as GMOs or living modified organisms (LMOs) -- "Frankenfoods" after the fictional man-made monster Frankenstein, saying they pose potential harm to human health and the environment.
Genetic modification can involve the introduction of genes from one plant to another or the switching of genes between plants and animals to change the way they develop, usually to protect them from disease or enhance their commercial value.
"We are happy with the outcome," Greenpeace delegation chief Doreen Stabinsky told AFP. "The US, Argentina and Canada were furious with the result."
Canada and Argentina are also major producers of GM crops and have not signed the protocol.
Under the new system, all shipments of GMOs such as seeds and fish that are meant to be introduced directly into the environment must be clearly identified, the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) said in a statement.
The common, scientific and commercial names of the modified organisms, along with the "transformation event code", must be documented, as well as the GMO "risk class" and contact details in case of emergency.
All bulk shipments of genetically-engineered crops intended for food, animal feed or processing, such as soybeans and maize, are to be labelled "may contain LMOs", the UNEP said.
A 15-member committee was established to monitor compliance with the protocol, while a group of legal and technical experts will develop regulations by 2008 covering liability and redress for damages resulting from transboundary movements of GMOs.
"Now that a system for identifying and labelling GMO exports has become operational, countries can enjoy the benefits of biotechnology with greater confidence while avoiding the potential risks," said Hamdallah Zedan, the Protocol's executive secretary.
"This rigorous system for handling, transporting, packaging and identifying GMOs is in the best interests of everyone -- developed and developing countries, consumers and industry, and all those who care deeply about our natural environment," he said.
The protocol forms part of the Convention on Biological Diversity, adopted by 150 countries after the Rio Earth summit in 1992, which aims to protect all forms of life from the ravages of human development.