Share this

by

Philip Stott

Sir, Oliver Kamm (Thunderer, May 19) is in my view correct to question the inherent "fairness" of "fair trade". "Fair trade" is a market distortion that benefits a small, chosen group of poor farmers to the disadvantage of the rest, many of whom are more efficient.

Low pay and profits are above all the result of global overproduction, supply outstripping demand, especially in primary products. The only "fair" way forward is to promote diversification into new areas of production, preferably in the secondary and tertiary sectors.

"Fair trade" is a subsidy, and we are fully aware of the distorting effects of such subsidies in the EU and on World Trade Organisation negotiations. To try to maintain production for which there is too little world demand is at best an error, at worst, immoral and unfair for those not so supported.

Yours faithfully, PHILIP STOTT (Emeritus Professor of Biogeography, University of London), 24 Clarence Place, Windmill Hill, Gravesend, Kent DA12 1LD.The Times (London):

Filed under