Summary

Sustainable agriculture and healthy nutrition are high on the social agenda. Work is now

being done to face both challenges, often with measurable success. However, huge changes

are still needed and some problems have even been exacerbated. Although agriculture and

nutrition are closely linked, both issues are often dealt with in isolation. One example is how

the recent proliferation of antibiotic-resistant bacteria in livestock farming has claimed

victims in hospitals.

The problems facing agriculture and nutrition have a range of different causes. According to

the Council for Integral Sustainable Agriculture and Nutrition there is one important but

underexposed cause: to a large extent, food production has been removed from its ecological

and social context. As a consequence, vital relationships and interactions have been lost.

The ecological context of agriculture has been reduced to systems with disrupted cycles and

low biodiversity, in which little self-regulation takes place. Such agricultural systems are

highly dependent on external inputs of fertilisers, pesticides and veterinary medicines.

In the social context of agriculture, the relationships between consumer and producer have

for the most part been lost. The geographical distance between the two has increased, as

has the number of links in the food production chain. Much of our food is processed, with the

consequence of it becoming anonymous to the consumer. As a result, consumers feel little

responsibility for the production methods and the agro-ecosystem. The same also applies to

the intermediate links: each is specialised in its own part of the chain, without having a view

of the chain as a whole. A system of ‘organised irresponsibility’ has been created. Although

each link is attempting to make its own contribution more sustainable, the result will not

necessarily be a sustainable chain.

According to the Council, there is an urgent need for an integral approach in three respects:

a) social and ecological sustainability, b) all links of the chain and c) agriculture and

nutrition. The central element is that food must once again be reconnected with visible ties

to its ecological and social context, so that relationships and contexts can be re-established.

A related consequence is that food production must be removed from its situation of

anonymity, and once again acquire a face and an identity. Such a development is often

simpler if food originates from your own region. The linear food chain must give way to a

circular food cycle, whereby consumer and producer re-establish some form of

communication with one another, and feel responsible for one another. This could result in

increased ecological resilience and social support, risk reduction and spread, the recovery of

nutrient cycles and an improved food quality as well as food culture..

 

Both at local level and in a number of chains, steps are already being taken in this direction.

The Council wishes to encourage these developments. Because any such change will require

new insight and knowledge, as its first step, the Council has drawn up a research agenda in

respect of the recovery of agro-ecological, social and societal relationships.