Nixon, NV, 4:00 pm PST. Scientists representing the publicly funded Human
Genome Project, and the private venture, Celera Corporation, announced
today they have completed a rough map of the human genome. The human
genome consists of two sets of 23 chromosomes, with each set containing a
total of 3 billion chemical units.
"This announcement, and genetic research generally, raises serious issues
of concern to indigenous peoples", said Debra Harry, Northern Paiute, and
Executive Director of the Indigenous Peoples Council on Biocolonialism.
She says, "Now that the sequencing project is complete more scientists will
turn their attention to human genetic diversity, which includes the
collection and study of the DNA of indigenous peoples. This is likely to
result in patents on the genetic inheritance of indigenous peoples, and
possible manipulations of their DNA, which violate the natural genetic
integrity of their ancestry".
Brett Shelton, Lakota, an attorney, and IPCB's Director of Policy and
Research states, "Therefore, indigenous peoples need to first obtain
information about genetic research likely to be done in their communities.
And, indigenous peoples need to assert their sovereign right to control
genetic research activities that affect them. They must set limitations
and enforce them when research activities affect their peoples." The IPCB
has developed a model ordinance for tribal governments that can be used to
govern scientific research in tribal jurisdictions.
Harry says, "I'm concerned that this furthers the hype for more genetic
research. The public is lead to believe this will lead to cures of human
diseases, however, cures are not going to be realized anytime in the near
future if at all, since most human illnesses are a result of complex
interactions between genes and the environment."
"Genetic research of this scale hurts, rather than benefits, indigenous
peoples because it diverts public funds away from direct health care and
prevention programs." She says "the millions of dollars spent on human
genome sequencing has diverted attention away from far more current and
pressing public health needs. The same amount of attention to insure we
have access to basic health care, clean water, safe foods, and a healthy
environment is an effort from which we would see real benefits."
Several critics of the current widespread emphasis on genomic research have
noted that economic oppression, not genetics, is a major cause of illness
in minority/ethnic communities. Harry notes, "An emphasis on genetic
research will pose no benefits to vast numbers of the American public,
whose health problems are a product of contaminated environments, and
economic poverty, not inherited diseases."
Dr. Jonathan King, Professor of Biology at MIT and a member of the board of
directors of the Council for Responsible Genetics states "We are concerned
that the emphasis on gene sequences will be used to imply that genes are at
the basis of a variety of human disease and conditions, when in fact the
great body of evidence, establishes that the majority of human ill health
is not inherited but is due to external insult including pollution,
infection, inadequate or in appropriate diet, physical accident, or excess
stress or social disruption such as wars". King further adds, "We note
that preventing damage to human genes from carcinogens is a far more
effective public health strategy than allowing the disease to develop and
then attempting gene therapy. "
Other scientists criticize the reductionist perspectives in the search for
genetic causes and cures of disease. Dr. Stuart Newman, Professor of Cell
Biology and Anatomy New York Medical College and a board member of the
Indigenous Peoples Council on Biocolonialism notes, "Although there are
potentially beneficial uses for the information gathered in the Human
Genome Project, there is also the great threat that this information will
be used to persuade people that they are not good enough, biologically.
This will be justified by promised improvements to human health, but unless
carefully monitored and regulated, this emphasis on genetics will have a
divisive effect, whereby those categories and groups of people that have
traditionally been marginalized will now learn that their genes are
inferior and need to be improved."
There are many potential negative aspects of human genetic research which
are not being widely discussed in the general public, yet have serious
social consequences such as genetic discrimination, or the hazards posed by
genetic engineering. These are serious questions that have not been
addressed, and require public debate and democratic control.
This work brings us closer to a future where the human genome can be
privatized, not to benefit people's health but to fatten corporate profits.
Already, patents have been filed, and then later abandoned, on the DNA of
indigenous peoples from the Solomon Islands and Panama. The U.S. Patent and
Trademarks Office (PTO) actually approved a patent on the cells lines of a
Hagahai man from Papua New Guinea. The patent was granted to the U.S.
Department of Health and Human Services and the National Institutes of
Health in March 1994. In late 1996 the NIH abandoned the patent. However,
the Hagahai cell line is now available to the public at the American Type
Culture Collection as ATCC Number: CRL-10528 Organism: Homo Sapiens (human)
for $216 per sample. This trend is likely to continue as new potentially
profitable genes are identified in indigenous populations.
Numerous patents have been granted to both public and private interests for
partial or full human genes. For instance, Celera has applied for 6,500
gene patents (1), while Incyte has filed patent applications covering
50,000 individual human genes (2). In order to stop the privatization and
commodification of the human genome, several citizens groups are calling
for national legislation to mandate the US Patent and Trademark Office to
cease granting patents on human genes, and to exclude living creatures,
their genes or components from the patent system.
Genetic engineering also poses risks for humanity because human biology can
be manipulated in a manner that redefines what it is to be human. For
example, Maori tribal members in New Zealand were horrified to learn they
were subjects of transgenic experiments where their human DNA was inserted
into sheep. Apparently one elderly tribal member was persuaded to sign a
consent form on behalf of the entire tribe. "The thought of human (Maori)
and animal genes being mixed was totally abhorrent and offensive both
culturally and morally."(3) This experimentation was carried out by PPL
Therapeutics, the commercial arm of the Roslin Institute which holds the
patent on cloning technology for all mammals. This incident highlights the
potential for human genetic manipulation when mechanisms for oversight,
control, and accountability are lacking.
Newman comments, "Some scientists and writers have indeed begun to advocate
remaking human biology using the new genetics, and predict that those who
are unable or unwilling to make use of these technologies will fall by the
wayside. A few organizations have taken up the fight to protect society
from the negative uses of this project. Some scientists, physicians, and
entrepreneurs will try to play god, and think they have the right to
redefine life. The public has to understand this and set limits."
The Indigenous Peoples Council on Biocolonialism is organized to assist
indigenous peoples in the protection of their genetic resources, indigenous
knowledge, and cultural and human rights from the negative effects of
biotechnology. The organization encourages indigenous peoples to pay
critical attention to genetic research, and to establish laws that protect
their resources from exploitation. More information on the work of the
IPCB can be found on their website at www.ipcb.org.
1. Celera Press Release "Celera compiles DNA Sequence Covering 90% of the
Human Genome", January 10, 2000
2. Incyte Press Release, November 22, 1999 PRNewswire
3. L.Pihama, C. Smith, Hands Off Our Genes: A Case Study on the Theft of
Whakapapa (Maori lineages), International Research Institute for Maori and
Indigenous Education, University of Auckland 1997
For further information, contact:
Debra Harry
Executive Director, Indigenous Peoples Council on Biocolonialism
Tel: (775) 574-0248
Fax: (775) 574-0259
Email: [email protected]
website: www.ipcb.org
